Notes
The image of Phra Sayomphuwanat that we show here dates to the rites held at Poh Chang Academy of the Arts in 2018.
We use the term ‘cult’ here with no pejorative connotations, and follow the recent definition given by Holly High: ‘a set of devotional practices that are conventional within a given cultural setting, but which do not necessarily adhere to the official doctrines of a major religion, and which are usually related to a particular figure and/or place.’ See High, H. (2022) An introduction to stone masters. In: High, H. (Ed.) Stone Masters: Power Encounters in Mainland Southeast Asia. Singapore: NUS Press, p. 8.
Wai khru ceremonies are also central to Thai spirit possession cults. The khrop khru rituals practiced during the wai khru ceremonies of traditional dance and drama lineages, as well as in spirit possession cults, feature initiands’ heads being covered by one of the masks used in Thai classical masked dance drama (khon), most often one of the character/deities of the Ramakien.
Poh Chang was named and opened by King Vajiravudh (Rama VI) in 1913. The name means both ‘germinating and cultivating craft’. It has gone through several institutional reorganisations, and most recently was incorporated as a part of Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin (RMUTR) in 2005.
See Wong, D. (2001) Sounding the Center: History and Aesthetics in Thai Buddhist Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, p. 8.
Wong uses a different method than we do when Romanising Thai, and we have modified the passage from her book accordingly. She also uses a different term for khrop khru, calling it itphithii khraup (‘covering ceremony’). See Wong, D. (2001) Sounding the Center: History and Aesthetics in Thai Buddhist Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, p. 8.
Bourdieu, P. (1991) Language and Symbolic Power. In: Thompson, J.B. (Ed.). Raymond, G. and Adamson, M. trans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 117-118.
Wong, D. (2001) Sounding the Center: History and Aesthetics in Thai Buddhist Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 27, 47, 276. A common Thai name for Vishnu is Phra Narai (after Vishnu Narayan, one of the iconic appellations for the god). Note, nonetheless, that the phonological resemblance between ‘Witsanu’ and ‘Vishnu’ may be enough to prompt popular identification of Witsanukam as Vishnu.
See George, K.M. and Narayan, K. (2022) Technophany and its publics: Artisans, technicians, and the rise of Vishwakarma worship in India, Journal of Asian Studies, 81(1), 1-19; and Narayan, K. and George, K.M. (2018) Vishwakarma: God of technology. In: Jacobsen. K.A. and Myrvold, K. (Eds.) Religion and Technology in India: Spaces, Practices and Authorities. Routledge: New York, pp. 8-24.
Jayawickrama, N.A. (Ed. and trans.) (1971) The chronicle of the Thūpa and the Thūpavaṃsa: being a translation and edition of Vācissarathera's Thūpavaṃsa [Sacred books of the Buddhists, 28.]. London: Pali Text Society.
We wish to note that in Thailand teachers and practitioners of the ‘fine arts’ enjoy the patronage of the Brahmanical god Ganesh, not Phra Witsanukam.
Irwin, A.L. (2022) The Buddha’s busted finger: Craft, touch, and cosmology in Theravada Buddhism, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 90(1), 52-85.
For more on the different uses of khru in the Thai case, and its relation to the Sanskritic categories, see Wong, D. (2001) Sounding the Center: History and Aesthetics in Thai Buddhist Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 7-8, 62-64.
The day we attended Poh Chang Academy was on Thursday 11 July 2019. In Thailand, Thursdays are marked as wan khru, ‘teacher/guru day’.
This image was made by three professors at Poh Chang and installed for the opening of the school in 1913. The gilded image is the school’s palladium and is so beloved that an exact replica was produced in 1919 and set up nearby to honour the school’s royal patron and first director, Prince Chuthathuttharadilok (Prince Chuthathut), brother of Rama VI.
Wong, D. (2001) Sounding the Center: History and Aesthetics in Thai Buddhist Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 74-76.
We will save for another article an account of the sometimes-violent clashes between students from rival schools, particularly when students from one school attempt to desecrate or otherwise ‘offend’ the Phra Witsanukam statue guarding over a rival campus.
Simondon, G. (2017) On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. Malaspina, C. and Rogove, J. trans. Minneapolis, MN: Univocal Publishing. See, too, Latour, B. (1994) Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In: Bijker, W.E. and Law, J. (Eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 225-258; and Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
See for example, George, K.M. and Narayan, K. (2022) Technophany and its publics: Artisans, technicians, and the rise of Vishwakarma worship in India, Journal of Asian Studies, 81(1), 2.
For a discussion of theophany, technophany, and technicity in Vishwakarma worship in India, see George, K.M. and Narayan, K. (2022) Technophany and its publics: Artisans, technicians, and the rise of Vishwakarma worship in India, Journal of Asian Studies, 81(1), 1-19.
Otto, T. and Smith, R.C. (2013) Design anthropology: A distinct style of knowing. In: Gunn, W, Otto, T. and R.C. Smith (Eds.) Design Anthropology: Theory and Practice, Routledge: New York, pp. 1-29.
We borrow the term ‘tool-being’ from Harman, G. (2005) Guerilla Metaphysics: Phenomenology and the Carpentry of Things. Chicago: Open Court Publishing. See, too, Latour, B. (1994) Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In: Bijker, W.E. and Law, J. (Eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change.Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 225-258; and Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Analogous understandings hold in India as well, where some Vishwakarma devotees state that the god resides in foot rules, hand tools, or machines, see for example Mukharji, P.B. (2018) Occulted materialities, History and Technology, 34(1), 31-40 and Narayan, K. and George, K.M. (2018) Vishwakarma: God of technology. In: Jacobsen. K.A. and Myrvold, K. (Eds.) Religion and Technology in India: Spaces, Practices and Authorities. Routledge: New York, pp. 8-24.
Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu (translation from the Pāli). (2013) Jhana Sutta: Mental Absorption (AN 4.123). Available at: https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an04/an04.123.than.html [Accessed 30th July 2022].
Suchman, L. (2018) Design. Available at: https://culanth.org/fieldsights/design [Accessed 29 March 2023].
References
Bourdieu, P. (1991) Language and symbolic power. In: Thompson, J.B. (Ed.). Raymond, G. and Adamson, M. trans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dekorlaku Music. (2018) 2. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c48f8hI9gQQ [Accessed 10th July 2019].
George, K.M. and Narayan, K. (2022) Technophany and its publics: Artisans, technicians, and the rise of Vishwakarma worship in India, Journal of Asian Studies, 81(1), 1-19.
Ginzburg, C. (1989) Clues, Myths, and the Historical Method. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Harman, G. (2005) Guerilla Metaphysics: Phenomenology and the Carpentry of Things. Peru, IL: Open Court Publishing.
High, H. (2022) An introduction to stone masters. In: High, H. (Ed.) Stone Masters: Power Encounters in Mainland Southeast Asia. Singapore: NUS Press, pp. 3-31.
Irwin, A.L. (2022) The Buddha’s busted finger: Craft, touch, and cosmology in Theravada Buddhism, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 90(1), 52-85.
Jayawickrama, N.A. (Ed. and trans.) (1971) The chronicle of the Thūpa and the Thūpavaṃsa: being a translation and edition of Vācissarathera's Thūpavaṃsa [Sacred books of the Buddhists, 28.]. London: Pali Text Society.
Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Latour, B. (1992) Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In: Bijker, W.E. and Law, J. (Eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 225-258.
Mukharji, P.B. (2018) Occulted materialities, History and Technology, 34(1), 31-40.
Narayan, K. and George, K.M. (2018) Vishwakarma: God of technology. In: Jacobsen. K.A. and Myrvold, K. (Eds.) Religion and Technology in India: Spaces, Practices and Authorities. Routledge: New York, pp. 8-24.
Otto, T. and Smith, R.C. (2013) Design anthropology: A distinct style of knowing. In: Gunn W, Otto, T. and Smith, R.C. (Eds.) Design Anthropology: Theory and Practice, Routledge: New York, pp. 1-29.
Simondon, G. (2017) On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. Malaspina, C. and Rogove, J. trans. Minneapolis, MN: Univocal Publishing.
Suchman, L. (2018) Design. Available at: https://culanth.org/fieldsights/design [Accessed 29th March 2023].
Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu (translation from the Pāli). (2013) Jhana Sutta: Mental Absorption (AN 4.123). Available at: https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an04/an04.123.than.html [Accessed 30th July 2022]
Wong, D. (2001) Sounding the Center: History and Aesthetics in Thai Buddhist Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(100 Years of Poh Chang: January 7, 1913 – 2013). (2013) Bangkok: (Krangpri International, Inc.).